Allen D et al (2012) Continuity of care in the transition from child to adult diabetes services: a realistic evaluation study.  Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 17(3): 140-148

Arksey H & Glendinning C (2007) Choice in the context of informal care-giving.  Health and Social Care in the Community 15(2): 165-175

Attride-Stirling J (2001) Thematic networks: an analytical tool for qualitative research.  Qualitative Research 1(3): 385-405

Barton L (2005) Emancipatory research and disabled people: some observations and questions.  Educational Review 57(3) 317-327

Baxter K, Glendinning C & Clarke S (2008) Making informed choices in social care: the importance of accessible information.  Health and Social Care in the Community 16(2): 197-207

Baxter K & Glendinning C (2011) Making choices about support services: disabled adults’ and older people’s use of information.  Health and Social Care in the Community 19(3): 272-279

Baxter K, Rabiee P & Glendinning C (2011) Choice and change: disabled adults’ and older people’s experiences of making choices about services and support.  Research Works, 2011-04, Social Policy Research Unit, University of York

Beresford B & Sloper T (2008) Understanding the Dynamics of Decision-Making and Choice: A Scoping Study of Key Psychological Theories to Inform the Design and Analysis of the Panel Study.  Social Policy Research Unit; University of York (Accessed 10 December 2012)

Bergin M, Wells J & Owen S (2008) Critical realism: a philosophical framework for the study of gender and mental health.  Nursing Philosophy 9, 169-179

Bhaskar R & Danermark B (2006) Metatheory, interdisciplinarity and disability research: A critical realist perspective.  Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 8(4):  278-297

Bishop L (2007) A reflexive account of reusing qualitative data: beyond primary/secondary dualism.  Sociological Research Online 12(3)> (Accessed 15 December 2012)

Bishop L (2012) Ethical Challenges in Archiving Qualitative Data.  UK Data Archive (Accessed 14 August 2012)

Blamey A & Mackenzie M (2007) Theories of change and realistic evaluation: Peas in a pod or apples and oranges?  Evaluation 13(4) 439-455

Bond R & Hurst J (2009) How adults with learning disabilities view living independently.  British Journal of Learning Disabilities 38: 286-292

Bonner L (2003) Using theory-based evaluation to build evidence-based health and social care policy and practice.  Critical Public Health 13(1) 77-92

Braun V & Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology.  Qualitative Research in Psychology 3: 77-101

Bricher G (2000) Disabled people, health professionals and the social model of disability: can there be a research relationship?  Disability & Society 15(5) 781-793

British Association of Social Workers (2002) The Code of Ethics for Social Work.  BASW Accessed 23 May 2013

Bryman A (2008) Social Research Methods (3rd edition); Oxford University Press; Oxford

Care Inspectorate (2011) [Urbal] Council Scrutiny Report (Accessed 12 July 2013)

Catts R & Allan J (2012) Social capital for young people in educational and social policy, practice and research.  In Allan J & Catts R (eds.) Social Capital, Children and Young People. Implications for practice, policy and research.  Policy Press; Bristol

Charmaz K (1990) Discovering chronic illness: Using grounded theory.  Social Science & Medicine 30(11): 1161-117

Charmaz K & Bryant (2011) Grounded theory and credibility.  In Silverman D (ed.) Qualitative Research (3rd edition); Sage; London

Cheseldine S (2010) Issues of Transition for Young People with Learning Disabilities Plus Other Complex Needs.  Joint Improvement Team; Accessed: 02 February 2011

Clarke J, Newman J & Westmarland L (2007) The antagonisms of choice: New Labour and the reform of public services.  Social Policy & Society 7(2) 245-253

Corbin J & Strauss A (1990) Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria.  Qualitative Sociology 13(1) 3-21

Coltart C, Henwood K & Shirani F (2013) Qualitative secondary analysis in austere times: ethical, professional and methodological considerations.  Forum: Qualitative Social Research 14(1): Art. 18

Davis J (2011) Integrated Children’s Services.  London; Sage

D’Cruz H, Gillingham P & Melendez S (2007) Reflexivity, its meanings and relevance for social work: a critical review of the literature.  British Journal of Social Work 37 73-90

Dickinson H (2006) The evaluation of health and social care partnerships: an analysis of approaches and synthesis for the future.  Health and Social Care in the Community 14(5) 375-383

Elliott N & Higgins A (2012) Surviving grounded theory research method in an academic world: Proposal writing and theoretical frameworks.  Grounded Theory Review 11(2)

European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (2012) Choice and Control: the Right to Independent Living.  http;//  (Accessed 12/07/2013)

Evans G (2013) A novice researcher’s first walk through the maze of grounded theory: Rationalization for classical grounded theory.  Grounded Theory Review 12(1)

Evans K et al (2001) Taking Control?  Agency in Young Adult Transitions in England and the New Germany.  Economic and Social Research Council’s Youth Citizenship and Social Change Programm

Finlay L (2002) Negotiating the swamp: the opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice.  Qualitative Research 2(2) 209-230

Fox R (2006) Informed choice in screening programmes: Do leaflets help?  A critical literature review.  Journal of Public Health 28(4): 309-317

Franklin A & Sloper P (2006) Participation of Disabled Children and Young People in Decision-Making Relating to Social Care.  Social Policy Research Unit, University of York  (Accessed 30 October 2012)

Franklin A & Knight A (2011) Someone on our side: Advocacy for disabled children and young people.  The Children’s Society  (Accessed 12 June 2013)

Fraser S & Matthews S (eds) (2008) The Critical Practitioner in Social Work and Health Care. London: Sage Publications

Glasby J & Littlechild R (2009) Direct Payments and Personal Budgets: Putting Personalisation into Practice.  Bristol: The Policy Press

Glasby J, Duffy S & Needham C (2011) A Beveridge report for the 21st century?  The implications of self-directed support for future welfare reform.  Policy & Politics 39(4): 613-621

Glaser B (2012) No preconception: the dictum.  Grounded Theory Review 11(2)

Glaser B (2013) Staying open: The use of theoretical codes in GT. Grounded Theory Review 12(1)

Gobo G (2011) Ethnography.  In Silverman D Qualitative Research (3rd edition); Sage; London

Green N (2008) Formulating and refining a research question.  In Gilbert N (ed.) Researching Social Life (3rd edition) Sage: London

Hammersley M (2010) Can we re-use qualitative data via secondary analysis? Notes on some terminological and substantive issues.  Sociological Research Online 15(1)> (Accessed 15 December 2012)

Hanberger A (2001) What is the policy problem?  Evaluation 7(1): 45-62

Haynes J & Jones D (2012) A tale of two analyses: the use of archived qualitative data.  Sociological Research Online 17(2) 1> (Accessed 20 January 2013)

Irvine A, Drew P & Sainsbury R (2012) ‘Am I not answering your questions properly?’  Clarification, adequacy and responsiveness in semi-structured telephone and face-to-face interviews.  Qualitative Research 13(1): 87-106

Irwin S & Winterton M (2011a) ‘Debates in Qualitative Secondary Analysis: Critical Reflections’, Timescapes Working Paper Series No. 4 (Accessed 02 October 2012)

Irwin S & Winterton M (2011b) ‘Timescapes Data and Secondary Analysis: Working across the Projects’, Timescapes Working Paper Series No. 5 (Accessed 02 October 2012)

Irwin S & Winterton M (2011c) ‘Qualitative Secondary Analysis in Practice: An extended guide’, Timescapes Working Paper Series No. 7 (Accessed 02 October 2012)

Jenkins L & Hay M (2010) Journeying towards personalisation.  From pilot to implementation: The learning and experiences of introducing self-directed support in Cambridgeshire.  Journal of Care Services Management 4(3) 236-249

Kaehne A & Beyer S (2009) Views of professionals on aims and outcomes of transition for young people with learning disabilities.  British Journal of Learning Disabilities 37 138-144

Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow.  Penguin; London

Knopf J et al (2008) Views of treatment decision making from adolescents with chronic illnesses and their parents: a pilot study.  Health Expectations 11: 343-354

Kroll T, Barbour R & Harris J (2007) Using focus groups in disability research.  Qualitative Health Research 17 (5) 690-698

Kwok K, McCallin A & Dickson G (2012) Working through preconception: Moving from forcing to emergence.  Grounded Theory Review 11(1)

Lampropoulou S & Myers G (2013) Stance-taking in interviews from the Qualidata Archive.  Forum: Qualitative Social Research 14(1): Art 12

Lockwood S (2013) Micro-enterprise: Community assets helping to deliver health and well-being and tackle health inequalities.  Journal of Integrated Care 21(1): 26-33

Lynch M (2000) Against reflexivity as an academic virtue and source of privileged knowledge.  Theory, Culture and Society 17(3) 26-54

MacIntyre G (2009) Transitions for young people with learning disabilities.  In Petch A (ed.) Managing Transitions. Bristol: The Policy Press

Maddison J & Beresford B (2012) Decision-making around moving on from full-time education: the roles and experiences of parents of disabled young people with degenerative conditions.  Health and Social Care in the Community 20(5): 477-487

Malecki E (2012) Regional social capital: why it matters.  Regional Studies 46(8): 1023-1039

Mansell J (2010) Raising our sights: services for adults with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities.  Tizard Centre; University of Kent

Manthorpe J et al (2011) Self Directed Support: A Review of the Barriers and Facilitators.  Scottish Government Social Research Accessed: 15 April 2013

Mauthner N & Doucet A (2003) Reflexive accounts and accounts of reflexivity in qualitative data analysis.  Sociology 37(3): 413-431

McLaughlin H (2012) Understanding Social Work Research (2nd edition).  Sage: London

Mill A, Mayes R & McConnell D (2009) Negotiating autonomy within the family: the experiences of young adults with intellectual disabilities.  British Journal of Learning Disabilities 38 194-200

Miller J & Glassner B (2011) The “inside” and the “outside”: finding realities in interviews.  In Silverman D Qualitative Research (3rd edition); Sage; London

Milliken P & Schreiber R (2012) Examing the nexus between grounded theory and symbolic interactionism.  International Journal for Qualitative Methodology 11(5): 684-696

Mills J, Bonner A & Francis K (2006) The development of constructivist grounded theory.  International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5(1): 1-10

Mitchell W (2011) Perspectives of disabled young people with degenerative conditions on making choices with parents and peers.  Qualitative Social Work 0(0): 1-23

Mitchell F (2012) Self-directed support and disabled young people in transition (part 1).  Journal of Integrated Care 20(1): 51-61

Mitchell W,  Maddison J & Beresford B (2011) Choice and change: how disabled young people with degenerative conditions and their parents make choices about care and services, Research Works, 2011-05, Social Policy Research Unit; University of York

Molyneaux V et al (2011) Reconsidering the term ‘carer’: a critique of the universal adoption of the term ‘carer’.  Ageing & Society 31 422-437

Moore N (2007) (Re)using qualitative data?  Sociological Research Online 12(3)> (Accessed 15 December 2012)

Mukherji P & Albon D (2010) Research Methods in Early Childhood.  Sage: London

Murphy J & Oliver T (2012) The use of Talking Mats to support people with dementia and their carers to make decisions together.  Health and Social Care in the Community 21(2): 171-180

Neale B & Bishop L (2012) ‘The Ethics of Archiving and Re-Using Qualitative Longitudinal Data: A Stakeholder Approach’, Timescapes Methods Guides Series No. 18 (Accessed 01 October 2012)

Neale B & Hanna E (2012) ‘The Ethics of Researching Lives Qualitatively Through Time’, Timescapes Methods Guides Series No. 11 (Accessed 01 October 2012)

Nikander P (2008) Working with transcripts and translated data.  Qualitative Research in Psychology 5(3): 225-231

Olsen W (2007) Critical realist explorations in methodology.  Methodological Innovations Online 2(2): 1-5

Padgett D (1998) Qualitative Methods in Social Work Research.  Sage Publications; London

Pawson R & Tilley N (1997) Realistic Evaluation; Sage; London

Pawson R (2002) Evidence-based policy: in search of a method.  Evaluation 8(2) 157-181

Payne J (2012) Scottish Parliament Information Centre (SPICe) Briefing 12/32: Social Care (Self-Directed Support) (Scotland) Bill.  (Accessed 27 July 2012)

Porter S & O’Halloran P (2011) The use and limitation of realistic evaluation as a tool for evidence-based practice: a critical realist perspective.  Nursing Inquiry 19(1): 18-28

Prior L (2003) Using Documents in Social Research Sage; London

Radha S et al (2012) Can patients really make an informed choice?  An evaluation of the availability of online information about consultant surgeons in the United Kingdom.  BMJ Open 0:e001203

Robson C (1993) Real World Research.  Blackwell; Oxford

Scott S, et al (2012) The reluctant researcher: shyness in the field.  Qualitative Research 12(6): 715-734

Scottish Government (2011) Self-directed Support: A draft Bill for consultation: December 2010 – March 2011: Analysis of Consultation Responses. (Accessed 05 December 2012)

Scottish Government (2013) A guide to the Social Care (Self-directed Support) (Scotland) Act 2013. (Accessed 01 June 2013)

Scottish Transitions Forum (2013) Principles of Good Transitions For Young People with Additional Support Needs.  (Accessed 15 May 2013)

Seale C (2011) Secondary Analysis of Qualitative Data.  In Silverman D (ed.) Qualitative Research (3rd edition).  Sage; London

Sims-Schouten W, Riley S & Willig C (2007) Critical realism in discourse analysis: A presentation of a systematic method of analysis using women’s talk of motherhood, childcare and female employment as an example.  Theory & Psychology 17(1): 101-124

Sin C (2005) Seeking informed consent: reflections on research practice.  Sociology 39(2): 277-294

Skukauskaite A (2012) Transparency in transcribing: Making visible theoretical bases impacting knowledge construction from open-ended interview records.  Forum: Qualitative Social Research 13(1): Art. 14

Smart M (2004) Transition planning and the needs of young people and their carers: the alumni project.  British Journal of Special Education 31(3) 128-137

Smithson J (2008) Focus Groups, in Alasuutari P, Bickman L & Brannen J (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Social Research Methods.  Sage: London

Smyth C & Bell D (2006) From biscuits to boyfriends: the ramifications of choice for people with learning disabilities.  British Journal of Learning Disabilities 34: 227-236

Social Work Inspection Agency (swia) (2010) Improving Social Work in Scotland. (accessed: 7 January 2012)

Speer S (2007) On recruiting conversation analysis for critical realist purposes.  Theory & Psychology 17(1): 125-135

Stevens M et al (2011) Assessing the role of increasing choice in English social care services.  Journal of Social Policy 40(2) 257-274

Stewart D, Shamdasani P & Rook D (2009) Group Depth Interviews: Focus Group Research, in Bickman L & Rog D (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Applied Social Research (2nd edition).  Sage: London

Strauss A & Corbin J (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage, London

Sullivan H & Stewart M (2006) Who owns the theory of change?  Evaluation 12 (2) 179-199

Tarleton B & Ward L (2005) Changes and choices: finding out what information young people with learning disabilities, their parents and supporters need at transition.  British Journal of Learning Disabilities 33 70-76

Taylor C & White S (2001) Knowledge, truth and reflexivity: the problem of judgement in social work.  Journal of Social Work 1(1) 37-59

Taylor S (2012) ‘One participant said…’: the implications of quotations from biographical talk.  Qualitative Research 12(4): 388-401

Thomas D (2003) A general inductive approach for qualitative data analysis.  School of Population Health, University of Auckland, New Zealand

Vogt W (ed.) (2008) Selecting Research Methods Vol. 1: Selecting Designs for Gathering Evidence; Sage; London

Walmsley J (2001) Normalisation, emancipatory research and inclusive research in learning disability.  Disability & Society 16(2) 187-205

Walmsley J & Johnson K (2003) Inclusive Research with People with Learning Disabilities.  Jessica Kingsley Publishers: London

Wilberforce M, et al (2011) Implementing consumer choice in long-term care: the impact of individual budgets on social care providers in England.  Social Policy & Administration 45(5): 593-612

Wiles R, et al (2007) Informed consent and the research process: following rules or striking balances?  Sociological Research Online 12(2)> (Accessed 10 October 2012)

Winter I (2000) Towards a theorised understanding of family life and social capital. Australian Institute of Family Studies Working Paper 21; Melbourne

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *