References

Allen D et al (2012) Continuity of care in the transition from child to adult diabetes services: a realistic evaluation study.  Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 17(3): 140-148

Arksey H & Glendinning C (2007) Choice in the context of informal care-giving.  Health and Social Care in the Community 15(2): 165-175

Attride-Stirling J (2001) Thematic networks: an analytical tool for qualitative research.  Qualitative Research 1(3): 385-405

Barton L (2005) Emancipatory research and disabled people: some observations and questions.  Educational Review 57(3) 317-327

Baxter K, Glendinning C & Clarke S (2008) Making informed choices in social care: the importance of accessible information.  Health and Social Care in the Community 16(2): 197-207

Baxter K & Glendinning C (2011) Making choices about support services: disabled adults’ and older people’s use of information.  Health and Social Care in the Community 19(3): 272-279

Baxter K, Rabiee P & Glendinning C (2011) Choice and change: disabled adults’ and older people’s experiences of making choices about services and support.  Research Works, 2011-04, Social Policy Research Unit, University of York

Beresford B & Sloper T (2008) Understanding the Dynamics of Decision-Making and Choice: A Scoping Study of Key Psychological Theories to Inform the Design and Analysis of the Panel Study.  Social Policy Research Unit; University of York www.york.ac.uk/spru (Accessed 10 December 2012)

Bergin M, Wells J & Owen S (2008) Critical realism: a philosophical framework for the study of gender and mental health.  Nursing Philosophy 9, 169-179

Bhaskar R & Danermark B (2006) Metatheory, interdisciplinarity and disability research: A critical realist perspective.  Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 8(4):  278-297

Bishop L (2007) A reflexive account of reusing qualitative data: beyond primary/secondary dualism.  Sociological Research Online 12(3) www.socresonline.org.uk/12/3/2.html> (Accessed 15 December 2012)

Bishop L (2012) Ethical Challenges in Archiving Qualitative Data.  UK Data Archive www.data-archive.ac.uk (Accessed 14 August 2012)

Blamey A & Mackenzie M (2007) Theories of change and realistic evaluation: Peas in a pod or apples and oranges?  Evaluation 13(4) 439-455

Bond R & Hurst J (2009) How adults with learning disabilities view living independently.  British Journal of Learning Disabilities 38: 286-292

Bonner L (2003) Using theory-based evaluation to build evidence-based health and social care policy and practice.  Critical Public Health 13(1) 77-92

Braun V & Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology.  Qualitative Research in Psychology 3: 77-101

Bricher G (2000) Disabled people, health professionals and the social model of disability: can there be a research relationship?  Disability & Society 15(5) 781-793

British Association of Social Workers (2002) The Code of Ethics for Social Work.  BASW www.basw.co.uk Accessed 23 May 2013

Bryman A (2008) Social Research Methods (3rd edition); Oxford University Press; Oxford

Care Inspectorate (2011) [Urbal] Council Scrutiny Report www.scswis.com (Accessed 12 July 2013)

Catts R & Allan J (2012) Social capital for young people in educational and social policy, practice and research.  In Allan J & Catts R (eds.) Social Capital, Children and Young People. Implications for practice, policy and research.  Policy Press; Bristol

Charmaz K (1990) Discovering chronic illness: Using grounded theory.  Social Science & Medicine 30(11): 1161-117

Charmaz K & Bryant (2011) Grounded theory and credibility.  In Silverman D (ed.) Qualitative Research (3rd edition); Sage; London

Cheseldine S (2010) Issues of Transition for Young People with Learning Disabilities Plus Other Complex Needs.  Joint Improvement Team; www.jit.org.uk Accessed: 02 February 2011

Clarke J, Newman J & Westmarland L (2007) The antagonisms of choice: New Labour and the reform of public services.  Social Policy & Society 7(2) 245-253

Corbin J & Strauss A (1990) Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria.  Qualitative Sociology 13(1) 3-21

Coltart C, Henwood K & Shirani F (2013) Qualitative secondary analysis in austere times: ethical, professional and methodological considerations.  Forum: Qualitative Social Research 14(1): Art. 18

Davis J (2011) Integrated Children’s Services.  London; Sage

D’Cruz H, Gillingham P & Melendez S (2007) Reflexivity, its meanings and relevance for social work: a critical review of the literature.  British Journal of Social Work 37 73-90

Dickinson H (2006) The evaluation of health and social care partnerships: an analysis of approaches and synthesis for the future.  Health and Social Care in the Community 14(5) 375-383

Elliott N & Higgins A (2012) Surviving grounded theory research method in an academic world: Proposal writing and theoretical frameworks.  Grounded Theory Review 11(2)

European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (2012) Choice and Control: the Right to Independent Living.  http;//fra.europa.eu/fraWebsite/attachments/FRA-2012-choice-and-control_EN.pdf  (Accessed 12/07/2013)

Evans G (2013) A novice researcher’s first walk through the maze of grounded theory: Rationalization for classical grounded theory.  Grounded Theory Review 12(1)

Evans K et al (2001) Taking Control?  Agency in Young Adult Transitions in England and the New Germany.  Economic and Social Research Council’s Youth Citizenship and Social Change Programm

Finlay L (2002) Negotiating the swamp: the opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice.  Qualitative Research 2(2) 209-230

Fox R (2006) Informed choice in screening programmes: Do leaflets help?  A critical literature review.  Journal of Public Health 28(4): 309-317

Franklin A & Sloper P (2006) Participation of Disabled Children and Young People in Decision-Making Relating to Social Care.  Social Policy Research Unit, University of York www.york.ac.uk/spru  (Accessed 30 October 2012)

Franklin A & Knight A (2011) Someone on our side: Advocacy for disabled children and young people.  The Children’s Society www.childrenssociety.org.uk/research  (Accessed 12 June 2013)

Fraser S & Matthews S (eds) (2008) The Critical Practitioner in Social Work and Health Care. London: Sage Publications

Glasby J & Littlechild R (2009) Direct Payments and Personal Budgets: Putting Personalisation into Practice.  Bristol: The Policy Press

Glasby J, Duffy S & Needham C (2011) A Beveridge report for the 21st century?  The implications of self-directed support for future welfare reform.  Policy & Politics 39(4): 613-621

Glaser B (2012) No preconception: the dictum.  Grounded Theory Review 11(2)

Glaser B (2013) Staying open: The use of theoretical codes in GT. Grounded Theory Review 12(1)

Gobo G (2011) Ethnography.  In Silverman D Qualitative Research (3rd edition); Sage; London

Green N (2008) Formulating and refining a research question.  In Gilbert N (ed.) Researching Social Life (3rd edition) Sage: London

Hammersley M (2010) Can we re-use qualitative data via secondary analysis? Notes on some terminological and substantive issues.  Sociological Research Online 15(1) www.socresonline.org.uk/15/1/5.html> (Accessed 15 December 2012)

Hanberger A (2001) What is the policy problem?  Evaluation 7(1): 45-62

Haynes J & Jones D (2012) A tale of two analyses: the use of archived qualitative data.  Sociological Research Online 17(2) 1 www.socresonline.org.uk/17/2/1.html> (Accessed 20 January 2013)

Irvine A, Drew P & Sainsbury R (2012) ‘Am I not answering your questions properly?’  Clarification, adequacy and responsiveness in semi-structured telephone and face-to-face interviews.  Qualitative Research 13(1): 87-106

Irwin S & Winterton M (2011a) ‘Debates in Qualitative Secondary Analysis: Critical Reflections’, Timescapes Working Paper Series No. 4  www.timescapes.leeds.ac.uk (Accessed 02 October 2012)

Irwin S & Winterton M (2011b) ‘Timescapes Data and Secondary Analysis: Working across the Projects’, Timescapes Working Paper Series No. 5 www.timescapes.leeds.ac.uk (Accessed 02 October 2012)

Irwin S & Winterton M (2011c) ‘Qualitative Secondary Analysis in Practice: An extended guide’, Timescapes Working Paper Series No. 7 www.timescapes.leeds.ac.uk (Accessed 02 October 2012)

Jenkins L & Hay M (2010) Journeying towards personalisation.  From pilot to implementation: The learning and experiences of introducing self-directed support in Cambridgeshire.  Journal of Care Services Management 4(3) 236-249

Kaehne A & Beyer S (2009) Views of professionals on aims and outcomes of transition for young people with learning disabilities.  British Journal of Learning Disabilities 37 138-144

Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow.  Penguin; London

Knopf J et al (2008) Views of treatment decision making from adolescents with chronic illnesses and their parents: a pilot study.  Health Expectations 11: 343-354

Kroll T, Barbour R & Harris J (2007) Using focus groups in disability research.  Qualitative Health Research 17 (5) 690-698

Kwok K, McCallin A & Dickson G (2012) Working through preconception: Moving from forcing to emergence.  Grounded Theory Review 11(1)

Lampropoulou S & Myers G (2013) Stance-taking in interviews from the Qualidata Archive.  Forum: Qualitative Social Research 14(1): Art 12

Lockwood S (2013) Micro-enterprise: Community assets helping to deliver health and well-being and tackle health inequalities.  Journal of Integrated Care 21(1): 26-33

Lynch M (2000) Against reflexivity as an academic virtue and source of privileged knowledge.  Theory, Culture and Society 17(3) 26-54

MacIntyre G (2009) Transitions for young people with learning disabilities.  In Petch A (ed.) Managing Transitions. Bristol: The Policy Press

Maddison J & Beresford B (2012) Decision-making around moving on from full-time education: the roles and experiences of parents of disabled young people with degenerative conditions.  Health and Social Care in the Community 20(5): 477-487

Malecki E (2012) Regional social capital: why it matters.  Regional Studies 46(8): 1023-1039

Mansell J (2010) Raising our sights: services for adults with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities.  Tizard Centre; University of Kent

Manthorpe J et al (2011) Self Directed Support: A Review of the Barriers and Facilitators.  Scottish Government Social Research www.scotland.gov.uk/socialresearch Accessed: 15 April 2013

Mauthner N & Doucet A (2003) Reflexive accounts and accounts of reflexivity in qualitative data analysis.  Sociology 37(3): 413-431

McLaughlin H (2012) Understanding Social Work Research (2nd edition).  Sage: London

Mill A, Mayes R & McConnell D (2009) Negotiating autonomy within the family: the experiences of young adults with intellectual disabilities.  British Journal of Learning Disabilities 38 194-200

Miller J & Glassner B (2011) The “inside” and the “outside”: finding realities in interviews.  In Silverman D Qualitative Research (3rd edition); Sage; London

Milliken P & Schreiber R (2012) Examing the nexus between grounded theory and symbolic interactionism.  International Journal for Qualitative Methodology 11(5): 684-696

Mills J, Bonner A & Francis K (2006) The development of constructivist grounded theory.  International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5(1): 1-10

Mitchell W (2011) Perspectives of disabled young people with degenerative conditions on making choices with parents and peers.  Qualitative Social Work 0(0): 1-23

Mitchell F (2012) Self-directed support and disabled young people in transition (part 1).  Journal of Integrated Care 20(1): 51-61

Mitchell W,  Maddison J & Beresford B (2011) Choice and change: how disabled young people with degenerative conditions and their parents make choices about care and services, Research Works, 2011-05, Social Policy Research Unit; University of York

Molyneaux V et al (2011) Reconsidering the term ‘carer’: a critique of the universal adoption of the term ‘carer’.  Ageing & Society 31 422-437

Moore N (2007) (Re)using qualitative data?  Sociological Research Online 12(3) www.socresonline.org.uk/12/3/1.html> (Accessed 15 December 2012)

Mukherji P & Albon D (2010) Research Methods in Early Childhood.  Sage: London

Murphy J & Oliver T (2012) The use of Talking Mats to support people with dementia and their carers to make decisions together.  Health and Social Care in the Community 21(2): 171-180

Neale B & Bishop L (2012) ‘The Ethics of Archiving and Re-Using Qualitative Longitudinal Data: A Stakeholder Approach’, Timescapes Methods Guides Series No. 18  www.timescapes.leeds.ac.uk (Accessed 01 October 2012)

Neale B & Hanna E (2012) ‘The Ethics of Researching Lives Qualitatively Through Time’, Timescapes Methods Guides Series No. 11 www.timescapes.leeds.ac.uk (Accessed 01 October 2012)

Nikander P (2008) Working with transcripts and translated data.  Qualitative Research in Psychology 5(3): 225-231

Olsen W (2007) Critical realist explorations in methodology.  Methodological Innovations Online 2(2): 1-5

Padgett D (1998) Qualitative Methods in Social Work Research.  Sage Publications; London

Pawson R & Tilley N (1997) Realistic Evaluation; Sage; London

Pawson R (2002) Evidence-based policy: in search of a method.  Evaluation 8(2) 157-181

Payne J (2012) Scottish Parliament Information Centre (SPICe) Briefing 12/32: Social Care (Self-Directed Support) (Scotland) Bill.  www.scottish.parliament.uk  (Accessed 27 July 2012)

Porter S & O’Halloran P (2011) The use and limitation of realistic evaluation as a tool for evidence-based practice: a critical realist perspective.  Nursing Inquiry 19(1): 18-28

Prior L (2003) Using Documents in Social Research Sage; London

Radha S et al (2012) Can patients really make an informed choice?  An evaluation of the availability of online information about consultant surgeons in the United Kingdom.  BMJ Open 0:e001203

Robson C (1993) Real World Research.  Blackwell; Oxford

Scott S, et al (2012) The reluctant researcher: shyness in the field.  Qualitative Research 12(6): 715-734

Scottish Government (2011) Self-directed Support: A draft Bill for consultation: December 2010 – March 2011: Analysis of Consultation Responses.  www.scotland.gov.uk (Accessed 05 December 2012)

Scottish Government (2013) A guide to the Social Care (Self-directed Support) (Scotland) Act 2013.  www.scotland.gov.uk (Accessed 01 June 2013)

Scottish Transitions Forum (2013) Principles of Good Transitions For Young People with Additional Support Needs. www.scottishtransitions.org.uk  (Accessed 15 May 2013)

Seale C (2011) Secondary Analysis of Qualitative Data.  In Silverman D (ed.) Qualitative Research (3rd edition).  Sage; London

Sims-Schouten W, Riley S & Willig C (2007) Critical realism in discourse analysis: A presentation of a systematic method of analysis using women’s talk of motherhood, childcare and female employment as an example.  Theory & Psychology 17(1): 101-124

Sin C (2005) Seeking informed consent: reflections on research practice.  Sociology 39(2): 277-294

Skukauskaite A (2012) Transparency in transcribing: Making visible theoretical bases impacting knowledge construction from open-ended interview records.  Forum: Qualitative Social Research 13(1): Art. 14

Smart M (2004) Transition planning and the needs of young people and their carers: the alumni project.  British Journal of Special Education 31(3) 128-137

Smithson J (2008) Focus Groups, in Alasuutari P, Bickman L & Brannen J (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Social Research Methods.  Sage: London

Smyth C & Bell D (2006) From biscuits to boyfriends: the ramifications of choice for people with learning disabilities.  British Journal of Learning Disabilities 34: 227-236

Social Work Inspection Agency (swia) (2010) Improving Social Work in Scotland.  www.swia.gov.uk (accessed: 7 January 2012)

Speer S (2007) On recruiting conversation analysis for critical realist purposes.  Theory & Psychology 17(1): 125-135

Stevens M et al (2011) Assessing the role of increasing choice in English social care services.  Journal of Social Policy 40(2) 257-274

Stewart D, Shamdasani P & Rook D (2009) Group Depth Interviews: Focus Group Research, in Bickman L & Rog D (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Applied Social Research (2nd edition).  Sage: London

Strauss A & Corbin J (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage, London

Sullivan H & Stewart M (2006) Who owns the theory of change?  Evaluation 12 (2) 179-199

Tarleton B & Ward L (2005) Changes and choices: finding out what information young people with learning disabilities, their parents and supporters need at transition.  British Journal of Learning Disabilities 33 70-76

Taylor C & White S (2001) Knowledge, truth and reflexivity: the problem of judgement in social work.  Journal of Social Work 1(1) 37-59

Taylor S (2012) ‘One participant said…’: the implications of quotations from biographical talk.  Qualitative Research 12(4): 388-401

Thomas D (2003) A general inductive approach for qualitative data analysis.  School of Population Health, University of Auckland, New Zealand

Vogt W (ed.) (2008) Selecting Research Methods Vol. 1: Selecting Designs for Gathering Evidence; Sage; London

Walmsley J (2001) Normalisation, emancipatory research and inclusive research in learning disability.  Disability & Society 16(2) 187-205

Walmsley J & Johnson K (2003) Inclusive Research with People with Learning Disabilities.  Jessica Kingsley Publishers: London

Wilberforce M, et al (2011) Implementing consumer choice in long-term care: the impact of individual budgets on social care providers in England.  Social Policy & Administration 45(5): 593-612

Wiles R, et al (2007) Informed consent and the research process: following rules or striking balances?  Sociological Research Online 12(2) www.socresonline.org.uk/12/2/wiles.html> (Accessed 10 October 2012)

Winter I (2000) Towards a theorised understanding of family life and social capital. Australian Institute of Family Studies Working Paper 21; Melbourne

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *