{"id":29,"date":"2014-02-03T16:55:12","date_gmt":"2014-02-03T16:55:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.researchunbound.org.uk\/self-directed-support\/?page_id=29"},"modified":"2019-04-10T16:29:11","modified_gmt":"2019-04-10T15:29:11","slug":"references","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.researchunbound.org.uk\/self-directed-support\/references\/","title":{"rendered":"References"},"content":{"rendered":"<ul>\n<li>Allen D et al (2012) Continuity of care in the transition from child to adult diabetes services: a realistic evaluation study.\u00a0 <i>Journal of Health Services Research &amp; Policy <\/i>17(3): 140-148<\/li>\n<li>Arksey H &amp; Glendinning C (2007) Choice in the context of informal care-giving.\u00a0 <i>Health and Social Care in the Community <\/i>15(2): 165-175<\/li>\n<li>Attride-Stirling J (2001) Thematic networks: an analytical tool for qualitative research.\u00a0 <i>Qualitative Research <\/i>1(3): 385-405<\/li>\n<li>Barton L (2005) Emancipatory research and disabled people: some observations and questions.\u00a0 <i>Educational Review <\/i>57(3) 317-327<\/li>\n<li>Baxter K, Glendinning C &amp; Clarke S (2008) Making informed choices in social care: the importance of accessible information.\u00a0 <i>Health and Social Care in the Community <\/i>16(2): 197-207<\/li>\n<li>Baxter K &amp; Glendinning C (2011) Making choices about support services: disabled adults\u2019 and older people\u2019s use of information.\u00a0 <i>Health and Social Care in the Community <\/i>19(3): 272-279<\/li>\n<li>Baxter K, Rabiee P &amp; Glendinning C (2011) Choice and change: disabled adults\u2019 and older people\u2019s experiences of making choices about services and support.\u00a0 <i>Research Works, <\/i>2011-04, Social Policy Research Unit, University of York<\/li>\n<li>Beresford B &amp; Sloper T (2008) <i>Understanding the Dynamics of Decision-Making and Choice: A Scoping Study of Key Psychological Theories to Inform the Design and Analysis of the Panel Study.\u00a0 <\/i>Social Policy Research Unit; University of York <a href=\"http:\/\/www.york.ac.uk\/spru\">www.york.ac.uk\/spru<\/a> (Accessed 10 December 2012)<\/li>\n<li>Bergin M, Wells J &amp; Owen S (2008) Critical realism: a philosophical framework for the study of gender and mental health.\u00a0 <i>Nursing Philosophy <\/i>9, 169-179<\/li>\n<li>Bhaskar R &amp; Danermark B (2006) Metatheory, interdisciplinarity and disability research: A critical realist perspective.\u00a0 <i>Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research <\/i>8(4):\u00a0 278-297<\/li>\n<li>Bishop L (2007) A reflexive account of reusing qualitative data: beyond primary\/secondary dualism.\u00a0 <i>Sociological Research Online <\/i>12(3) www.socresonline.org.uk\/12\/3\/2.html&gt; (Accessed 15 December 2012)<\/li>\n<li>Bishop L (2012) <i>Ethical Challenges in Archiving Qualitative Data<\/i>.\u00a0 UK Data Archive <a href=\"http:\/\/www.data-archive.ac.uk\">www.data-archive.ac.uk<\/a> (Accessed 14 August 2012)<\/li>\n<li>Blamey A &amp; Mackenzie M (2007) Theories of change and realistic evaluation: Peas in a pod or apples and oranges?\u00a0 <i>Evaluation <\/i>13(4) 439-455<\/li>\n<li>Bond R &amp; Hurst J (2009) How adults with learning disabilities view living independently.\u00a0 <i>British Journal of Learning Disabilities <\/i>38: 286-292<\/li>\n<li>Bonner L (2003) Using theory-based evaluation to build evidence-based health and social care policy and practice.\u00a0 <i>Critical Public Health <\/i>13(1) 77-92<\/li>\n<li>Braun V &amp; Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology.\u00a0 <i>Qualitative Research in Psychology <\/i>3: 77-101<\/li>\n<li>Bricher G (2000) Disabled people, health professionals and the social model of disability: can there be a research relationship?\u00a0 <i>Disability &amp; Society <\/i>15(5) 781-793<\/li>\n<li>British Association of Social Workers (2002) <i>The Code of Ethics for Social Work<\/i>.\u00a0 BASW <a href=\"http:\/\/www.basw.co.uk\">www.basw.co.uk<\/a> Accessed 23 May 2013<\/li>\n<li>Bryman A (2008) <i>Social Research Methods (3<sup>rd<\/sup> edition); <\/i>Oxford University Press; Oxford<\/li>\n<li>Care Inspectorate (2011) <i>[Urbal] Council Scrutiny Report <\/i> (Accessed 12 July 2013)<\/li>\n<li>Catts R &amp; Allan J (2012) Social capital for young people in educational and social policy, practice and research.\u00a0 In Allan J &amp; Catts R (eds.) <i>Social Capital, Children and Young People. Implications for practice, policy and research.\u00a0 <\/i>Policy Press; Bristol<\/li>\n<li>Charmaz K (1990) Discovering chronic illness: Using grounded theory.\u00a0 <i>Social Science &amp; Medicine <\/i>30(11): 1161-117<\/li>\n<li>Charmaz K &amp; Bryant (2011) Grounded theory and credibility.\u00a0 In Silverman D (ed.) <i>Qualitative Research (3rd edition)<\/i>; Sage; London<\/li>\n<li>Cheseldine S (2010) <i>Issues of Transition for Young People with Learning Disabilities Plus Other Complex Needs.\u00a0 <\/i>Joint Improvement Team; Accessed: 02 February 2011<\/li>\n<li>Clarke J, Newman J &amp; Westmarland L (2007) The antagonisms of choice: New Labour and the reform of public services.\u00a0 <i>Social Policy &amp; Society <\/i>7(2) 245-253<\/li>\n<li>Corbin J &amp; Strauss A (1990) Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria.\u00a0 <i>Qualitative Sociology <\/i>13(1) 3-21<\/li>\n<li>Coltart C, Henwood K &amp; Shirani F (2013) Qualitative secondary analysis in austere times: ethical, professional and methodological considerations.\u00a0 <i>Forum: Qualitative Social Research <\/i>14(1): Art. 18<\/li>\n<li>Davis J (2011) <i>Integrated Children\u2019s Services.\u00a0 <\/i>London; Sage<\/li>\n<li>D\u2019Cruz H, Gillingham P &amp; Melendez S (2007) Reflexivity, its meanings and relevance for social work: a critical review of the literature.\u00a0 <i>British Journal of Social Work <\/i>37 73-90<\/li>\n<li>Dickinson H (2006) The evaluation of health and social care partnerships: an analysis of approaches and synthesis for the future.\u00a0 <i>Health and Social Care in the Community <\/i>14(5) 375-383<\/li>\n<li>Elliott N &amp; Higgins A (2012) Surviving grounded theory research method in an academic world: Proposal writing and theoretical frameworks.\u00a0 <i>Grounded Theory Review <\/i>11(2)<\/li>\n<li>European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (2012) <i>Choice and Control: the Right to Independent Living.\u00a0 <\/i>http;\/\/fra.europa.eu\/fraWebsite\/attachments\/FRA-2012-choice-and-control_EN.pdf\u00a0 (Accessed 12\/07\/2013)<\/li>\n<li>Evans G (2013) A novice researcher\u2019s first walk through the maze of grounded theory: Rationalization for classical grounded theory.\u00a0 <i>Grounded Theory Review <\/i>12(1)<\/li>\n<li>Evans K <i>et al <\/i>(2001) <i>Taking Control?\u00a0 Agency in Young Adult Transitions in England and the New Germany<\/i>.\u00a0 Economic and Social Research Council\u2019s Youth Citizenship and Social Change Programm<\/li>\n<li>Finlay L (2002) Negotiating the swamp: the opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice.\u00a0 <i>Qualitative Research <\/i>2(2) 209-230<\/li>\n<li>Fox R (2006) Informed choice in screening programmes: Do leaflets help?\u00a0 A critical literature review.\u00a0 <i>Journal of Public Health <\/i>28(4): 309-317<\/li>\n<li>Franklin A &amp; Sloper P (2006) <i>Participation of Disabled Children and Young People in Decision-Making Relating to Social Care.\u00a0 <\/i>Social Policy Research Unit, University of York <a href=\"http:\/\/www.york.ac.uk\/spru\">www.york.ac.uk\/spru<\/a>\u00a0 (Accessed 30 October 2012)<\/li>\n<li>Franklin A &amp; Knight A (2011) <i>Someone on our side: Advocacy for disabled children and young people<\/i>.\u00a0 The Children\u2019s Society <a href=\"http:\/\/www.childrenssociety.org.uk\/research\">www.childrenssociety.org.uk\/research<\/a>\u00a0 (Accessed 12 June 2013)<\/li>\n<li>Fraser S &amp; Matthews S (eds) (2008) <i>The Critical Practitioner in Social Work and Health Care. <\/i>London:<i> <\/i>Sage Publications<\/li>\n<li>Glasby J &amp; Littlechild R (2009) <i>Direct Payments and Personal Budgets: Putting Personalisation into Practice.\u00a0 <\/i>Bristol: The Policy Press<\/li>\n<li>Glasby J, Duffy S &amp; Needham C (2011) A Beveridge report for the 21<sup>st<\/sup> century?\u00a0 The implications of self-directed support for future welfare reform.\u00a0 <i>Policy &amp; Politics <\/i>39(4): 613-621<\/li>\n<li>Glaser B (2012) No preconception: the dictum.\u00a0<i> Grounded Theory Review <\/i>11(2)<\/li>\n<li>Glaser B (2013) Staying open: The use of theoretical codes in GT. <i>Grounded Theory Review <\/i>12(1)<\/li>\n<li>Gobo G (2011) Ethnography.\u00a0 In Silverman D <i>Qualitative Research (3rd edition)<\/i>; Sage; London<\/li>\n<li>Green N (2008) Formulating and refining a research question.\u00a0 In Gilbert N (ed.) <i>Researching Social Life (3<sup>rd<\/sup> edition) Sage: London<\/i><\/li>\n<li>Hammersley M (2010) Can we re-use qualitative data via secondary analysis? Notes on some terminological and substantive issues.\u00a0 <i>Sociological Research Online <\/i>15(1) www.socresonline.org.uk\/15\/1\/5.html&gt; (Accessed 15 December 2012)<\/li>\n<li>Hanberger A (2001) What is the policy problem?\u00a0 <i>Evaluation <\/i>7(1): 45-62<\/li>\n<li>Haynes J &amp; Jones D (2012) A tale of two analyses: the use of archived qualitative data.\u00a0 <i>Sociological Research Online<\/i> 17(2) 1 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.socresonline.org.uk\/17\/2\/1.html\">www.socresonline.org.uk\/17\/2\/1.html<\/a>&gt; (Accessed 20 January 2013)<\/li>\n<li>Irvine A, Drew P &amp; Sainsbury R (2012) \u2018Am I not answering your questions properly?\u2019\u00a0 Clarification, adequacy and responsiveness in semi-structured telephone and face-to-face interviews.\u00a0 <i>Qualitative Research <\/i>13(1): 87-106<\/li>\n<li>Irwin S &amp; Winterton M (2011a) \u2018Debates in Qualitative Secondary Analysis: Critical Reflections\u2019, <i>Timescapes Working Paper Series No. 4\u00a0 <\/i><a href=\"http:\/\/www.timescapes.leeds.ac.uk\">www.timescapes.leeds.ac.uk<\/a> (Accessed 02 October 2012)<\/li>\n<li>Irwin S &amp; Winterton M (2011b) \u2018Timescapes Data and Secondary Analysis: Working across the Projects\u2019, <i>Timescapes Working Paper Series No. 5 <\/i><a href=\"http:\/\/www.timescapes.leeds.ac.uk\">www.timescapes.leeds.ac.uk<\/a> (Accessed 02 October 2012)<\/li>\n<li>Irwin S &amp; Winterton M (2011c) \u2018Qualitative Secondary Analysis in Practice: An extended guide\u2019, <i>Timescapes Working Paper Series No. 7 <\/i><a href=\"http:\/\/www.timescapes.leeds.ac.uk\">www.timescapes.leeds.ac.uk<\/a> (Accessed 02 October 2012)<\/li>\n<li>Jenkins L &amp; Hay M (2010) Journeying towards personalisation.\u00a0 From pilot to implementation: The learning and experiences of introducing self-directed support in Cambridgeshire.\u00a0 <i>Journal of Care Services Management <\/i>4(3) 236-249<\/li>\n<li>Kaehne A &amp; Beyer S (2009) Views of professionals on aims and outcomes of transition for young people with learning disabilities.\u00a0 <i>British Journal of Learning Disabilities <\/i>37 138-144<\/li>\n<li>Kahneman D (2011) <i>Thinking, Fast and Slow.\u00a0 <\/i>Penguin; London<\/li>\n<li>Knopf J <i>et al <\/i>(2008) Views of treatment decision making from adolescents with chronic illnesses and their parents: a pilot study.\u00a0 <i>Health Expectations <\/i>11: 343-354<\/li>\n<li>Kroll T, Barbour R &amp; Harris J (2007) Using focus groups in disability research.\u00a0 <i>Qualitative Health Research <\/i>17 (5) 690-698<\/li>\n<li>Kwok K, McCallin A &amp; Dickson G (2012) Working through preconception: Moving from forcing to emergence.\u00a0 <i>Grounded Theory Review <\/i>11(1)<\/li>\n<li>Lampropoulou S &amp; Myers G (2013) Stance-taking in interviews from the Qualidata Archive.\u00a0 <i>Forum: Qualitative Social Research <\/i>14(1): Art 12<\/li>\n<li>Lockwood S (2013) Micro-enterprise: Community assets helping to deliver health and well-being and tackle health inequalities.\u00a0 <i>Journal of Integrated Care <\/i>21(1): 26-33<\/li>\n<li>Lynch M (2000) Against reflexivity as an academic virtue and source of privileged knowledge.\u00a0 <i>Theory, Culture and Society <\/i>17(3) 26-54<\/li>\n<li>MacIntyre G (2009) Transitions for young people with learning disabilities.\u00a0 In Petch A (ed.) <i>Managing Transitions<\/i>. Bristol:<i> <\/i>The Policy Press<\/li>\n<li>Maddison J &amp; Beresford B (2012) Decision-making around moving on from full-time education: the roles and experiences of parents of disabled young people with degenerative conditions.\u00a0 <i>Health and Social Care in the Community <\/i>20(5): 477-487<\/li>\n<li>Malecki E (2012) Regional social capital: why it matters.\u00a0 <i>Regional Studies <\/i>46(8): 1023-1039<\/li>\n<li>Mansell J (2010) <i>Raising our sights: services for adults with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities.\u00a0 <\/i>Tizard Centre; University of Kent<\/li>\n<li>Manthorpe J <i>et al <\/i>(2011) <i>Self Directed Support: A Review of the Barriers and Facilitators.\u00a0 <\/i>Scottish Government Social Research <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scotland.gov.uk\/socialresearch\">www.scotland.gov.uk\/socialresearch<\/a> Accessed: 15 April 2013<\/li>\n<li>Mauthner N &amp; Doucet A (2003) Reflexive accounts and accounts of reflexivity in qualitative data analysis.\u00a0 <i>Sociology <\/i>37(3): 413-431<\/li>\n<li>McLaughlin H (2012) <i>Understanding Social Work Research (2<sup>nd<\/sup> edition).\u00a0 <\/i>Sage: London<\/li>\n<li>Mill A, Mayes R &amp; McConnell D (2009) Negotiating autonomy within the family: the experiences of young adults with intellectual disabilities.\u00a0 <i>British Journal of Learning Disabilities <\/i>38 194-200<\/li>\n<li>Miller J &amp; Glassner B (2011) The \u201cinside\u201d and the \u201coutside\u201d: finding realities in interviews.\u00a0 In Silverman D <i>Qualitative Research (3rd edition)<\/i>; Sage; London<\/li>\n<li>Milliken P &amp; Schreiber R (2012) Examing the nexus between grounded theory and symbolic interactionism.\u00a0 <i>International Journal for Qualitative Methodology <\/i>11(5): 684-696<\/li>\n<li>Mills J, Bonner A &amp; Francis K (2006) The development of constructivist grounded theory.\u00a0 <i>International Journal of Qualitative Methods <\/i>5(1): 1-10<\/li>\n<li>Mitchell W (2011) Perspectives of disabled young people with degenerative conditions on making choices with parents and peers.\u00a0 <i>Qualitative Social Work <\/i>0(0): 1-23<\/li>\n<li>Mitchell F (2012) Self-directed support and disabled young people in transition (part 1).\u00a0 <i>Journal of Integrated Care <\/i>20(1): 51-61<\/li>\n<li>Mitchell W,\u00a0 Maddison J &amp; Beresford B (2011) Choice and change: how disabled young people with degenerative conditions and their parents make choices about care and services, <i>Research Works, <\/i>2011-05, Social Policy Research Unit; University of York<\/li>\n<li>Molyneaux V <i>et al <\/i>(2011) Reconsidering the term \u2018carer\u2019: a critique of the universal adoption of the term \u2018carer\u2019.\u00a0 <i>Ageing &amp; Society <\/i>31 422-437<\/li>\n<li>Moore N (2007) (Re)using qualitative data?\u00a0 <i>Sociological Research Online <\/i>12(3) <a href=\"http:\/\/www.socresonline.org.uk\/12\/3\/1.html\">www.socresonline.org.uk\/12\/3\/1.html<\/a>&gt; (Accessed 15 December 2012)<\/li>\n<li>Mukherji P &amp; Albon D (2010) <i>Research Methods in Early Childhood.\u00a0 <\/i>Sage: London<\/li>\n<li>Murphy J &amp; Oliver T (2012) The use of Talking Mats to support people with dementia and their carers to make decisions together.\u00a0 <i>Health and Social Care in the Community <\/i>21(2): 171-180<\/li>\n<li>Neale B &amp; Bishop L (2012) \u2018The Ethics of Archiving and Re-Using Qualitative Longitudinal Data: A Stakeholder Approach\u2019, <i>Timescapes Methods Guides Series No. 18\u00a0 <\/i><a href=\"http:\/\/www.timescapes.leeds.ac.uk\">www.timescapes.leeds.ac.uk<\/a> (Accessed 01 October 2012)<\/li>\n<li>Neale B &amp; Hanna E (2012) \u2018The Ethics of Researching Lives Qualitatively Through Time\u2019, <i>Timescapes Methods Guides Series No. 11 <\/i><a href=\"http:\/\/www.timescapes.leeds.ac.uk\">www.timescapes.leeds.ac.uk<\/a> (Accessed 01 October 2012)<\/li>\n<li>Nikander P (2008) Working with transcripts and translated data.\u00a0 <i>Qualitative Research in Psychology <\/i>5(3): 225-231<\/li>\n<li>Olsen W (2007) Critical realist explorations in methodology.\u00a0 <i>Methodological Innovations Online <\/i>2(2): 1-5<\/li>\n<li>Padgett D (1998) <i>Qualitative Methods in Social Work Research.\u00a0 <\/i>Sage Publications; London<\/li>\n<li>Pawson R &amp; Tilley N (1997) <i>Realistic Evaluation; <\/i>Sage; London<\/li>\n<li>Pawson R (2002) Evidence-based policy: in search of a method.\u00a0 <i>Evaluation <\/i>8(2) 157-181<\/li>\n<li>Payne J (2012) <i>Scottish Parliament Information Centre (SPICe) Briefing 12\/32: Social Care (Self-Directed Support) (Scotland) Bill<\/i>.<i>\u00a0 <\/i><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scottish.parliament.uk\">www.scottish.parliament.uk<\/a>\u00a0 (Accessed 27 July 2012)<\/li>\n<li>Porter S &amp; O\u2019Halloran P (2011) The use and limitation of realistic evaluation as a tool for evidence-based practice: a critical realist perspective.\u00a0 <i>Nursing Inquiry <\/i>19(1): 18-28<\/li>\n<li>Prior L (2003) <i>Using Documents in Social Research <\/i>Sage; London<\/li>\n<li>Radha S <i>et al <\/i>(2012) Can patients really make an informed choice?\u00a0 An evaluation of the availability of online information about consultant surgeons in the United Kingdom.\u00a0 <i>BMJ Open <\/i>0:e001203<\/li>\n<li>Robson C (1993) <i>Real World Research.\u00a0 <\/i>Blackwell; Oxford<\/li>\n<li>Scott S, et al (2012) The reluctant researcher: shyness in the field.\u00a0 <i>Qualitative Research <\/i>12(6): 715-734<\/li>\n<li>Scottish Government (2011) <i>Self-directed Support: A draft Bill for consultation: December 2010 \u2013 March 2011: Analysis of Consultation Responses.\u00a0 <\/i><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scotland.gov.uk\">www.scotland.gov.uk<\/a> (Accessed 05 December 2012)<\/li>\n<li>Scottish Government (2013) <i>A guide to the Social Care (Self-directed Support) (Scotland) Act 2013.\u00a0 <\/i><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scotland.gov.uk\">www.scotland.gov.uk<\/a> (Accessed 01 June 2013)<\/li>\n<li>Scottish Transitions Forum (2013) <i>Principles of Good Transitions For Young People with Additional Support Needs. <\/i><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scottishtransitions.org.uk\">www.scottishtransitions.org.uk<\/a>\u00a0 (Accessed 15 May 2013)<\/li>\n<li>Seale C (2011) Secondary Analysis of Qualitative Data.\u00a0 In Silverman D (ed.) <i>Qualitative Research (3<sup>rd<\/sup> edition)<\/i>.\u00a0 Sage; London<\/li>\n<li>Sims-Schouten W, Riley S &amp; Willig C (2007) Critical realism in discourse analysis: A presentation of a systematic method of analysis using women\u2019s talk of motherhood, childcare and female employment as an example.\u00a0 <i>Theory &amp; Psychology <\/i>17(1): 101-124<\/li>\n<li>Sin C (2005) Seeking informed consent: reflections on research practice.\u00a0 <i>Sociology <\/i>39(2): 277-294<\/li>\n<li>Skukauskaite A (2012) Transparency in transcribing: Making visible theoretical bases impacting knowledge construction from open-ended interview records.\u00a0 <i>Forum: Qualitative Social Research <\/i>13(1): Art. 14<\/li>\n<li>Smart M (2004) Transition planning and the needs of young people and their carers: the alumni project.\u00a0 <i>British Journal of Special Education <\/i>31(3) 128-137<\/li>\n<li>Smithson J (2008) Focus Groups, in Alasuutari P, Bickman L &amp; Brannen J (eds.) <i>The Sage Handbook of Social Research Methods.\u00a0 <\/i>Sage: London<\/li>\n<li>Smyth C &amp; Bell D (2006) From biscuits to boyfriends: the ramifications of choice for people with learning disabilities.\u00a0 <i>British Journal of Learning Disabilities <\/i>34: 227-236<\/li>\n<li>Social Work Inspection Agency (swia) (2010) <i>Improving Social Work in Scotland.\u00a0<\/i> (accessed: 7 January 2012)<\/li>\n<li>Speer S (2007) On recruiting conversation analysis for critical realist purposes.\u00a0 <i>Theory &amp; Psychology <\/i>17(1): 125-135<\/li>\n<li>Stevens M <i>et al <\/i>(2011) Assessing the role of increasing choice in English social care services.\u00a0 <i>Journal of Social Policy <\/i>40(2) 257-274<\/li>\n<li>Stewart D, Shamdasani P &amp; Rook D (2009) Group Depth Interviews: Focus Group Research, in Bickman L &amp; Rog D (eds.) <i>The Sage Handbook of Applied Social Research (2<sup>nd<\/sup> edition).\u00a0 <\/i>Sage: London<\/li>\n<li>Strauss A &amp; Corbin J (1998) <i>Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. <\/i>Sage, London<\/li>\n<li>Sullivan H &amp; Stewart M (2006) Who owns the theory of change?\u00a0 <i>Evaluation <\/i>12 (2) 179-199<\/li>\n<li>Tarleton B &amp; Ward L (2005) Changes and choices: finding out what information young people with learning disabilities, their parents and supporters need at transition.\u00a0 <i>British Journal of Learning Disabilities <\/i>33 70-76<\/li>\n<li>Taylor C &amp; White S (2001) Knowledge, truth and reflexivity: the problem of judgement in social work.\u00a0 <i>Journal of Social Work <\/i>1(1) 37-59<\/li>\n<li>Taylor S (2012) \u2018One participant said&#8230;\u2019: the implications of quotations from biographical talk.\u00a0 <i>Qualitative Research <\/i>12(4): 388-401<\/li>\n<li>Thomas D (2003) A general inductive approach for qualitative data analysis.\u00a0 School of Population Health, University of Auckland, New Zealand<\/li>\n<li>Vogt W (ed.) (2008) <i>Selecting Research Methods Vol. 1: Selecting Designs for Gathering Evidence; <\/i>Sage; London<\/li>\n<li>Walmsley J (2001) Normalisation, emancipatory research and inclusive research in learning disability.\u00a0 <i>Disability &amp; Society <\/i>16(2) 187-205<\/li>\n<li>Walmsley J &amp; Johnson K (2003) <i>Inclusive Research with People with Learning Disabilities.\u00a0 <\/i>Jessica Kingsley Publishers: London<\/li>\n<li>Wilberforce M, <i>et al <\/i>(2011) Implementing consumer choice in long-term care: the impact of individual budgets on social care providers in England.\u00a0 <i>Social Policy &amp; Administration <\/i>45(5): 593-612<\/li>\n<li>Wiles R, et al (2007) Informed consent and the research process: following rules or striking balances?\u00a0 <i>Sociological Research Online <\/i>12(2) <a href=\"http:\/\/www.socresonline.org.uk\/12\/2\/wiles.html\">www.socresonline.org.uk\/12\/2\/wiles.html<\/a>&gt; (Accessed 10 October 2012)<\/li>\n<li>Winter I (2000) <i>Towards a theorised understanding of family life and social capital. <\/i>Australian Institute of Family Studies Working Paper 21; Melbourne<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Allen D et al (2012) Continuity of care in the transition from child to adult diabetes services: a realistic evaluation study.\u00a0 Journal of Health Services Research &amp; Policy 17(3): 140-148 Arksey H &amp; Glendinning C (2007) Choice in the context of informal care-giving.\u00a0 Health and Social Care in the Community 15(2): 165-175 Attride-Stirling J (2001) &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.researchunbound.org.uk\/self-directed-support\/references\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">References<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","template":"","meta":[],"categories":[],"tags":[],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.researchunbound.org.uk\/self-directed-support\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/29"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.researchunbound.org.uk\/self-directed-support\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.researchunbound.org.uk\/self-directed-support\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.researchunbound.org.uk\/self-directed-support\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.researchunbound.org.uk\/self-directed-support\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=29"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.researchunbound.org.uk\/self-directed-support\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/29\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.researchunbound.org.uk\/self-directed-support\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=29"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.researchunbound.org.uk\/self-directed-support\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=29"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.researchunbound.org.uk\/self-directed-support\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=29"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}